
The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation of work by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, you acknowledge and confirm that:
We use privacy-conscious analytics cookies to understand how visitors use this site. No third-party advertising cookies are used. See our Cookie Notice for details.
Judgment Digest
Six Supreme Court rulings of 16 October 2026: limits of Letters Patent appeals, limitation in title suits, private complaints under Section 125A RP Act, reasoned bail orders, candour in parallel remedies and the reach of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Supreme Court of India
2026 INSC 1136 · 16 October 2026
A Letters Patent Bench cannot displace a just and reasoned writ-court decision merely because it prefers another view; interference requires a material or glaring error. The removal, founded on conjectural findings, was quashed and the writ order restored.
Supreme Court of India
2026 INSC 1137 · 16 October 2026
A decades-late suit for possession founded on an agreement to sell was hopelessly time-barred; an agreement to sell does not convey title, a bare possession claim cannot survive a registered deed clouding title, and Section 53A was unavailable where the contract had been abandoned.
Supreme Court of India
2026 INSC 1138 · 16 October 2026
A private complaint alleging a false election affidavit under Section 125A of the Representation of the People Act is maintainable and is not controlled by Section 195(1) CrPC, though the quashing was retained on the facts as the allegation was effectively rebutted.
PDF not displaying? Open it directly.
Judgments change the landscape quickly. Speak with us about how a development affects your matter.
Supreme Court of India
2026 INSC 1139 · 16 October 2026
Bail orders must show independent consideration of material evidence with concise reasons; High Court orders that ignored video footage and Section 161 statements were set aside and remitted, with interim bail continued.
Supreme Court of India
2026 INSC 1140 · 16 October 2026
A bail petition was revived for fresh consideration because urgent vacation listing and material non-disclosure offended the duty of utmost candour; ordinarily a “two weeks hence” listing direction excludes an intervening vacation unless the Bench directs otherwise.
Supreme Court of India
2026 INSC 1147 · 16 October 2026
Section 17A protects only offences relatable to official recommendations or decisions; demanding a bribe falls outside it, and a Section 19 sanction obtained before cognizance sufficed, so the charge and trial were allowed to proceed.